You can be “non” without being “anti”.
I’m not a protestant (I’m Mormon), but that doesn’t make me anti-protestant. The two are mutually exclusive. And there’s a big difference from being “non” (like being non-Mormon), and being anti. One is innocent, without malice, while the other is focused upon criticism and destruction.
I recently commented on another post, that as I study the life of the Savior, what I find is not a pattern of him being “anti” anything. He didn’t seek opportunities to refute others. Instead, he demonstrated a life of building, creating, of going around teaching the gospel, creating truth and testimony, performing miracles. The times when he DID become more hostile or accusatory are when others sought him out to refute him, or to persecute him. They were the “anti’s”. Instead, His life was one of tolerance and love, understanding and empathy. His conversations were not crammed with criticism.
Such were the teachings of Rabbi Gamaliel of Tarsus as described in Acts who counseled Saul and others against persecuting the saints. Acts chapter 5 describes an event where Gamaliel encouraged moderation, saying “take heed to yourselves what ye intend to do as touching these men… refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought: But ifit be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against god.” (Acts 5:38-39)
This is wisdom. This is the character of Christ, whereas “anti” is an attribute of the adversary. The one is centered around moderation, love, patience, kindness, tolerance, and understanding, the other centered around destruction, negativism, criticism, and judgement.
Theodore Roosevelt said it well:
“It is not the critic who counts, not the one who points out how the strong man stumbles, or how the doer of deeds might have done them better. No, the credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat, and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again… Who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, and spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”
If you’re going to be “anti”, be anti about principles and morals, things like “anti-abortion”, “anti-dishonesty”, “anti-drug abuse”, but don’t be anti about people or religions, for such is not the character of Christ. As the Lord taught Peter, we must have compassion, and forgive all men their trespasses.